Popular
AvailableAI Ethics
A safety-first AI ethics overview for family history contexts.AI in family history must be careful: it can assist research, but it should not replace evidence, consent, human judgment, or dignity.
What this means
- AI output should be labeled, explainable, and source-grounded where used.
- AI should not make final historical, legal, medical, or identity decisions.
- Sensitive AI processing such as OCR, face, voice, and private story analysis needs separate approval.
How AINMAX supports this
- Responsible AI resources describe planned safety boundaries.
- AI Research pages remain public/static unless accepted capabilities exist.
- No AI processing is activated by this content batch.
What is available now
- Static AI Ethics resource page.
- Links to Responsible AI and AI Research Guide.
- No AI/OCR/face/voice processing, model training, or automated decisions from this page.
What is planned
- Detailed AI governance before sensitive AI features.
- Human-review and explainability rules.
- AI audit and disclosure policy only after separate planning.
This page does not activate AI, OCR, face recognition, voice processing, AI training, medical prediction, or automated identity decisions.