Skip to contentAINMAXSTORIES CONNECT

Popular

Available

AI Ethics

A safety-first AI ethics overview for family history contexts.

AI in family history must be careful: it can assist research, but it should not replace evidence, consent, human judgment, or dignity.

What this means

  • AI output should be labeled, explainable, and source-grounded where used.
  • AI should not make final historical, legal, medical, or identity decisions.
  • Sensitive AI processing such as OCR, face, voice, and private story analysis needs separate approval.

How AINMAX supports this

  • Responsible AI resources describe planned safety boundaries.
  • AI Research pages remain public/static unless accepted capabilities exist.
  • No AI processing is activated by this content batch.

What is available now

  • Static AI Ethics resource page.
  • Links to Responsible AI and AI Research Guide.
  • No AI/OCR/face/voice processing, model training, or automated decisions from this page.

What is planned

  • Detailed AI governance before sensitive AI features.
  • Human-review and explainability rules.
  • AI audit and disclosure policy only after separate planning.
Privacy / safety note

This page does not activate AI, OCR, face recognition, voice processing, AI training, medical prediction, or automated identity decisions.

Related resources

Continue reading